Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
RV530
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy