Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +1955%
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
240
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G86
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy