NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
0.874 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+251%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
36.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
873.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
72.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF104-325-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
