NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
19120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
0.874 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+9250%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
36.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
873.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
72.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GF104-325-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
153 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
