NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
0.874 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+42%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
36.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
873.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
72.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Lexa
GF104-325-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
