NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2
1.046 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1047%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.19GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
7
SM Count
22
336
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
AD107
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
