Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +1481%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
102.7GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
11
SM Count
18
352
Shading Units
2560
44
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
26.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
855.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
106.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
AD107
GF100-030-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy