Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +121%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.7GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
1024
44
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
26.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
855.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
106.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF100-030-A3
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy