Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480
1.345 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +699%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
15
SM Count
-
480
Shading Units
3584
60
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
42.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
1345 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
168.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Vega 10
GF100-375-A3
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy