NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 490 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 164.0GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 365W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 490
1.166 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+144%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
854 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
164.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
15
SM Count
14
480
Shading Units
896
60
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
36.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1166 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
365W
TDP
80W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU116
GF100-375-A3
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
