Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (152.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +53%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 500
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1440
56
TMUs
72
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
640 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Cypress
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy