Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +524%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 500
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
640 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Fiji
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy