NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+814%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 500
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
22
448
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
AD107
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
