NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 12 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock2130MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)

2368 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

1.312 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation +814%

12 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

VS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Nov 2011

Release Date

Feb 2024

GeForce 500

Generation

Quadro Ada

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1620 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2130 MHz

950 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

1280MB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

320bit

Memory Bus

128bit

152.0GB/s

Bandwidth

256.0GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

22

-

Compute Units

-

448

Shading Units

2816

56

TMUs

88

40

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

88

-

RT Cores

22

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

640 KB

L2 Cache

12 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

102.2 GPixel/s

40.99 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

187.4 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

12.00 TFLOPS

1312 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

12.00 TFLOPS

164.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110

GPU Name

AD107

GF110-270-A1

GPU Variant

-

Fermi 2.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

40 nm

Process Size

5 nm

3 billion

Transistors

18.9 billion

520 mm²

Die Size

159 mm²

Board Design

210W

TDP

70W

550 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

2.0

CUDA

8.9

5.1

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs ATI Radeon HD 3550

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W