Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs AMD FirePro W7100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
1.263 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +161%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.17 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
52.67 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
1263 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Tonga
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy