Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
1.933 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +538%
12.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1344
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
80.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
1.933 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
80.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD107
N13E-GSR-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net