NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (1680MHz vs 758MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1504%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
1344
Shading Units
9728
112
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD103
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
