Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1019MHz vs 925MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690 +65%
3.13 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy