Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2640MHz vs 1239MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +965%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy