Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1239MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +1%
1.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy