NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
520 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+864%
1.389 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
RV630
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
