NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+475%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0
