NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FirePro V3700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+2070%
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
RV620
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
