NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+167%
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Redwood
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
