NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+126%
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Cayman
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
