NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+38%
1.389 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
RV770
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
