NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 69W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+440%
1.389 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
640
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT215
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
