NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1665MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+114%
2.984 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1276
GeForce GTX 1650
+179%
3566
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
308
GeForce GTX 1650
+421%
1606
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
