NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1190MHz vs 1085MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+31%
1.828 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
98
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+82%
179
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+22%
44
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM206
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
