NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1650MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
+204%
4.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1276
Radeon Pro 5300
+257%
4558
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Navi 14
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
