NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1219MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+11%
1.389 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+6%
1276
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1194
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
308
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+76%
544
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Lexa
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
