NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750
1.111 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+81%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1440
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1111 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Cypress
GM107-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
