Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Boost Clock888MHz
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
2.046 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +320%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
888 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
4096
96
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
85.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
85.25 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GK104-200-KD-A2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy