Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +30%
2.634 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1440
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cypress
GK104-325-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy