Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +113%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
2816
96
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy