Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD FirePro W7100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +38%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Tonga
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy