Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 131% (1515MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +207%
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
1380 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
TU117
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy