Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock657MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M +162%
1.009 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 700M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
-
657 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
RV730
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy