Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (1350MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +996%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 700M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Vega 10
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy