Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (975MHz vs 657MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +97%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy