Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Boost Clock657MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +268%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
-
657 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Amethyst
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy