Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 222% (2115MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +1187%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
AD107
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy