Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1200MHz vs 863MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M
1.326 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +62%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 700M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Baffin
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy