NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1785MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+6%
5.345 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 700
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
2880
Shading Units
1408
240
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
TU116
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
