NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1683MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
P102 100
+101%
10.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce 700
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
25
2880
Shading Units
3200
240
TMUs
200
48
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
GP102
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
