NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (2100MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+1428%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
19456
240
TMUs
1216
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
153 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
