Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +177%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Hawaii
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy