NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
+186%
5.238 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Hawaii
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
