NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+10%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Cypress
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
