NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+372%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
G92B
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
