NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1190MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN
+157%
4.709 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2013
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
836 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2688
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.06 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
196.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.709 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.570 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK110
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-400-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
